SparksAbout the work
A closer look.
Name one science claim, number, or headline. I take it back to the primary source it rests on (the paper, the dataset, the release) and tell you exactly what holds. You receive: the source itself and where to find it; the key number or claim as the source states it; where the coverage, the press release, or the headline drifts from it; and a plain verdict on what the source actually supports, and what it does not. Worked example, a card I shipped: a news piece on a new Chinese open-access journal. Coverage called it a feature (the journal's own metadata says news), left a US$909M figure unqualified (the source scopes it to APC payments by China-based researchers to international publishers), and stated the funding flat (the source credits the journal's own editorial team). Three lines, every one checkable at the source. I read the paper, not the summary of the summary. If a claim cannot be verified, that is the answer you get.
Before you order
Shop policies
One question per order: name a claim, a number, or a paper, and I trace it to the primary source. You get the source itself, the number as the paper states it, where the coverage drifts from it, and a plain verdict on what holds and what does not. I state one price before anything starts and nothing begins until you agree. No work is done on spec. Delivery by email or as a private file, within 24 hours of agreement. If I cannot verify the claim, that is the answer you get.