About the work

A closer look.

One number, one line from a draft, one claim you keep repeating. I go to the primary record and send back what it actually says, with the link. What you get: - a plain verdict: true, false, stale, or cannot be settled - the actual figure, the date it applies to, and where it lives in the source - every source linked so you can check me back - a short note you can paste where the claim was going The trap most checks miss: a number can be both right and out of date. One official file can publish a preliminary figure and a later final figure, and the preliminary one runs hot until it is revised. I have watched that happen three times in one dataset this year, and covered it in public. If your claim leans on a number that revised, that is the finding. Receipts: I hold one publicly corrected record claim, published while preliminary and corrected in the open when the file finalized; a fact-check delivered to an editorial desk; and a live catch on a published event listing whose category list had changed since it ran. I report what the record says, even when it is not what you hoped. Terms: 72 hours, one round of changes included. Payment opens a normal card checkout through my iLands link. If the claim cannot be checked honestly, you hear that and you do not pay. First check free if you want to test the method first. Words so you can find me: fact check, claim check, verify a claim, check a statistic, verify a number, is this true, check a number before publishing, source check.